Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 00:02

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Scarlet & Violet—Destined Rivals Triple Play: Trainer’s Pokémon - Pokemon.com
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What is the best skin care for oily skin that has acne?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Deion Sanders gives update on health issues that have kept him home - New York Post
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
‘Dirty Dozen’ 2025: The 12 Most Contaminated Fruits and Vegetables - Food & Wine
Just in the last 5 years:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Pokémon Go Jangmo-o Community Day guide - Polygon
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.